Sue Gray’s £170,000 Salary Sparks Government Tensions Amid Labour’s Victory

Recent reports have highlighted growing tensions within the government over staff salaries, particularly focusing on Sue Gray, Sir Keir Starmer’s chief of staff. Gray’s salary, now at £170,000, surpasses that of the Prime Minister, leading to controversy and dissatisfaction among other government staff. This issue comes on the heels of Labour’s recent election victory and has prompted questions about internal pay fairness and management.

In response to concerns about the internal salary dispute, the Prime Minister defended his position, stating that he remains in control of government operations and is dedicated to fulfilling the Labour government’s mandate. He emphasized that despite the internal issues, his primary focus is on achieving the goals set out during the election campaign.

The increase in Gray’s salary has sparked significant debate among government advisers, many of whom feel their compensation is insufficient by comparison. Some advisers are dismayed, having expected salary increases upon joining the government but finding their expectations unmet.

While some defend Gray against what they perceive as unfair personal criticism, others hold her responsible for the perceived inequities.

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds clarified that the Prime Minister was not involved in the decision to raise Gray’s salary. Reynolds attributed the salary adjustments to a standard civil service process, which operates independently of political influence.

He also expressed frustration over the internal leaks, suggesting that the focus should be on the government’s performance rather than on salary disputes.

The controversy has been further fueled by criticism from the Conservatives, who question whether the Prime Minister personally approved the salary increase and changes to pay bands. They have contrasted this issue with cuts to winter fuel payments for pensioners, framing it as an example of preferential treatment for government staff.

Former Downing Street communications director Guto Harri also criticized the optics of a chief of staff earning more than the Prime Minister, arguing that it undermines both professionalism and public trust.